Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various options available for teens in light of the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
Almost all of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, and this helps it be hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are due to smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. It also assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The writer suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from this is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects Electric Tobacconist of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking cigarettes, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers may be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. It also means that they are taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the level of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that people have already seen the negative effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports concerning the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have a lot of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a key point in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last couple of years.
The writer does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to think about the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so because of other health issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are various reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it holds true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in using tobacco are found in the smokes. The author seems to be of the fact that all we need to do to solve the problem of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not based in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the number of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.